CHI 97 REVIEWER VOLUNTEER FORM Please email this completed form to the Papers Co-chairs (chi97-tech-program@acm.org). There are 5 sections to this form: 1. Contact Information (required) 2. Participation Categories (required) 3. Paper Submission Types (only required if paper reviewing is chosen) 4. Matching Phrases (required) 5. Reviewing Background (optional) Be sure to complete all of the required sections. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONTACT INFORMATION First Name: Last Name: Affiliation: Postal Address:(must include street and telephone number) Express Delivery Address:(must include street and telephone number) Country: Daytime telephone: Home telephone: Fax: E-mail address: Video Capability: [] Quicktime [] Video for Windows [] NTSC/VHS [] PAL/VHS [] Other ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please indicate [x] all categories that you are willing and able to review: SUBMISSION TYPES YOU ARE WILLING TO REVIEW Early Submissions (reviews done late September through mid October 1996). Note: you may volunteer for multiple categories but will not be asked to participate in more than one of the three review-intensive categories of Papers, Design Briefings and Technical Notes. []Nothing this Year [] Demonstrations Share system or technology developments in formal or interactive setting [] Design Briefings Discuss process of designing an interface. [] Organizational Overviews Summarize HCI work taking place in institutions, organizations, or groups [] Panels Discuss and debate pressing issues [] Papers Report research or practical results [] Technical Notes Present brief, tightly argued ideas or findings [] Videos Show and report on high-quality taped presentation of dynamic interactions [] Workshop Discuss focused topic in a small-group setting Late-Breaking Submissions (reviews done QUICKLY in late January 1997) []Nothing this Year [] Interactive Posters Research or experiences that are best conveyed in graphical format are good candidates for this category, for example, descriptions of work that rely significantly on screen shots or diagrammatic visuals. [] Social Action Posters Social action posters provide examples of ways in which the CHI community can use their talents to influence the future through social action. [] Late-Breaking Results Present late-breaking results or ongoing work in interactive format -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CURRENT INTERESTS Please describe in a few sentences your current work: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MATCHING PHRASES The following list contains over 100 phrases that authors will select among to characterize their submissions, and that we will use to match submissions to appropriate reviewers. Please rate each of these phrases on the following 6-point scale: [0]- No reviewing You do not want to review any submissions in this area. [1]- Outsider's impression This is not your area, but you are willing to give an outsider's impression. [2]- Passing knowledge You have a passing knowledge of this area. [3]- Knowledgable You are knowlegable in this area. [4]- Expert You are an expert in this area. [5]- Expert and motivated You are an expert in this area and you really want to review submissions in this area. A []Agents []Analysis methods []Auditory I/O C []Children []Cognitive models []CSCL/Collaborative learning []CSCW/Collaborative work []Community computing []Cooperative design []Cost/benefit analysis D []Database access []Design rationale []Design techniques []Development tools []Dialog analysis []Disability access []Documentation systems []Domain-specific applications E []Educational applications []Electronic publishing []Empirical studies []End-user programming []Entertainment []Ethnography []Evaluation []Expert systems F []Formal methods []The future G []Graphic design []GOMS H []Hand-held devices []HCI education []HCI in organizations []HCI profession issues []Home []Hypermedia I []Individual differences []Industrial design []Information retrieval []Input devices []Intelligent systems []Interaction technology []Interaction design []International interfaces []Internet L []Legal issues M []Metaphors []Mobile Computing []Multimedia N []Network/communications O []Office computing P []Participatory design []Pen-based input []Predictive interface []Programming environments []Prototyping []Psychology of programming S []Social issues []Software engineering []Speech and voice []Standards T []Tactile or gestural I/O []Task analysis []Technology transfer []Telecommunications []Teleworking []Theory []3-D interfaces []Toolkits []Training U []Ubiquitous computing []UIMS []Usability engineering []Usability testing []UI design environments []User models []User studies V []Video []Video analysis []Virtual community []Virtual reality []Visual design []Visualization W []World wide web []Work analysis In addition to this list, please include any other phrases that will match the abstracts of the submissions you would like to review: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REVIEWING BACKGROUND This section is not required. Previous CHI Publications: []Yes []No Previous CHI Reviewing : Be sure to indicate year and participation category. Other Relevant Reviewing: Other Relevant Experience: --------- END OF FORM -----------------------