2.  Review Form for Workshop Submissions
 --------------------------------------------------------------------
Reviewer:

Workshop Title:

Organizer(s):

Please evaluate the TOPIC of the workshop (e.g. appropriateness,
timeliness, level of interest, intended audience, balance with other 
workshop topics, etc.). Choose ONE of the evaluations below and elaborate.

     Excellent because:

     Good because:

     OK because:

     Poor because:


Please evaluate the FORMAT of the workshop (e.g. duration, number of
topics covered, time allocation, activities, level of interactivity, 
number of participants, outcome of the workshop, etc.). 
Choose ONE of the evaluations below and elaborate.

     Excellent because:

     Good because:

     OK because:

     Poor because:


Please comment on the ORGANIZATIONAL or planning aspects of the workshop 
(e.g. are the pre-workshop activities appropriate? do the organizers
leave enough time to coordinate the pre-workshop activities? is the call for 
participation acceptable? Is the Conference Companion submission acceptable? 
have they considered ways to reach a broad audience? do the organizers 
appear to have sufficent expertise in the area? etc.)

     Excellent because:

     Good because:

     OK because:

     Poor because:

(Optional) Please comment on any OTHER issues not covered above. 
(Include any additional advice you may have to the organizers about 
ways to improve the workshop.)



OVERALL QUALITY RATING:

        a. Definitely accept
        b. Accept
        c. Borderline
        d. Reject
        e. Definitely reject

OVERALL RANKING:
(1 is best proposal, 2 is next best, etc.)

----------------------------------------------------------------------